Oh the worlds we burn together

An Egalitarian blogging about sexism, discrimination, feminism, mens rights activism, and all sorts of other *isms.
~ Thursday, May 31 ~
Permalink

honeynbees:

worldsweburntogether:

honeynbees:

Occasionally I take on the grand task of Understanding Mens Rights™. I think to myself, ‘goodness there seems to be a blossoming population of people who really believe feminists are destructive to society and male privilege doesn’t exist… they must have some convincing arguments!’ Oh but there are none. Why do I do this?!?!? I am only setting myself up for extreme disappointment. Fuck Mens Rights™ advocates. I will give you a kitten if you can explain one point of Mens Rights™ to me that doesn’t make me want to puke up my dinner.

Male rape victims being provided services

male victims of abuse being provided services

both of the above being recognized by society

judicial fairness

laws which do not entitle nor discriminate between sexes

i could go on, but i expect at least five kittens for now.

:D thanks for replying to me, worldsweburntogether!

I totally agree with everything you said, these are things that I fight for with my feminism! I think that male survivors not being supported or provided services is a result of the misogynism and patriarchy of our society that tells men they must be tough and macho. Also, judicial fairness would be improved by deconstructing patriarchal epistemologies. Sexual violence is often a result of power structures and systems of oppression and so I believe that it’s important to provide services to survivors with a focus on minority groups, be that men or women of color, disabled men and women, LGBTQ folks, men and women from lower socioeconomic classes, etc.

And I’m curious on the judicial fairness and discriminatory laws points. In my opinion, both men and women are discriminated in the judicial system because laws often adhere to gender stereotypes. Female victims are often turned away because people believe they are overreacting or lying (because women are hormonal and illogical according to our societal norms) and males are often turned away because of the idiotic misconception that men can’t be raped or abused (because men always want sex or could defend themselves if they needed to acc. to societal norms)

So my question to you is: Do you see much difference between what I’m trying to accomplish with feminism and what you’re trying to accomplish with your activism? If you also see the parallels that I see, why is it that men’s rights activism and feminist activism have to be so antagonized?

well, i think male survivors not being provided services is a result of misandry, as misogyny would indicate discrimination toward women and w’re not talking about women.

that would probably be the first problem between you and an MRA. an MRA would feel male victims being treated poorly is a result of men being treated poorly. a feminist may/often does feel that men being treated poorly is a result of women being treated poorly.

i think judicial fairness would be improved by… well, enforcing judicial fairness. raising awareness of misandry, for example, may assist in showing them men are being mistreated. feminism tends to focus on how women are treated. the MRA tend to focus on how men are treated.

i think non-consensual sexual violence is often a result of people being screwed up in the head and having a thirst for power. to my understanding, rapists tend to rape on account of what amounts to a power trip. i’m not sure what you mean by power structures, unless you mean that the rapist is the powered and the victim is the non-powered.

well, there are currently a number of laws which favor women explicitly, federal programs which are only available to women while no such programs exist for men, and parenting rights. women are also able to force men into legalized debt slavery should they so choose, which i think is a bit unfair. many MRAs will fight for the right to opting out of child support. since women can opt out of having children, as is their bodily right, they feel that men should have the right to opt out of being a father, as is their financial right. well. it isn’t their right, but hopefully that will one day change.

you’re right about the rape thing, of course. for example, men aren’t even federally recognized as being victims of female-on-male rape, and the UK states that women cannot rape. at all. the MRAs feel this is rather unfair, considering it is systemic misandry.

yes, i do see the difference, though i myself am not an MRA. 

feminism is focused on women.

the MRM is focused on men.

and that will always be the downfall of both.

Tags: feminism mrm
11 notes
reblogged via honeyonbeez
Permalink

bluetrafficlight:

agentclintbarton:

colamania:

reyaroxx:

johnzilla87:

carcrashjules:

gueravonlok:

girlgrowingsmall:

moreinclinedtoactmyshoesize:

droogywoog:

suffren:

gerrisdrinkwater:

eridan-ampwwhora:

ibrakeforunicorns:

thelaughingstache:

danielmcbatman:

bedheadreams:

Just a little reminder in case you non-vegans forget that what you’re eating is a chicken’s menstruation cycle. So glad I’m not guzzling down anyone’s period anymore.

OMG YOU MEAN EGGS DON’T COME FROM MAGIC?!! THANK YOU SUPERVEGAN! 

just had eggs god they were delish

man i love eggs

im sorry i just find pretentious vegans to be really hilarious

mmm delicious chicken periods

ok

its a fucking egg cell

do you know what else has the same purpose as egg cells?

seeds

do you know what holds seeds?

fruit.

enjoy eating your plant uterus, OP

sorry i couldn’t hear you over my delicious sizzling chicken periods

OH MY GOD YOU GUYS! THIS TOTALLY HAPPENED TO ME THIS MORNING!

I WAS MAKING EGGS FOR BREAKFAST, JUST MINDING MY OWN BUSINESS, AND THEN BAM! SUDDENLY IT BECAME A BABY CHICKEN!

Instead of eggs and bacon I grabbed some Orange Soda and had dinner for breakfast.

It was delicious.

These comments are hilarious. I love eggs. 

I said this was just a bit too gross to reblog but Kay dared me to do it. “Don’t be a chicken” she said…

Some vegans forget that we’re animals ourselves.. People have been eating eggs forever, as do animals that eat eachother.. its nature and we’re not above it, we’re part of it. 

Thank you so much, this post has really enlightened me.

I was wondering what to have for lunch, but after seeing this, I fancy a fried egg…

To make this post, did you find some have half developed baby chickens? You sick fuck.

actually egg yolk is unfertilised

shows how much you know

i have on rare occasion actually cracked an egg into a frying pan, only to have a partially formed dead chick plop out. >_> 

…i still like to eat eggs, though.


15,935 notes
reblogged via bluetrafficlight
Permalink

honeynbees:

Occasionally I take on the grand task of Understanding Mens Rights™. I think to myself, ‘goodness there seems to be a blossoming population of people who really believe feminists are destructive to society and male privilege doesn’t exist… they must have some convincing arguments!’ Oh but there are none. Why do I do this?!?!? I am only setting myself up for extreme disappointment. Fuck Mens Rights™ advocates. I will give you a kitten if you can explain one point of Mens Rights™ to me that doesn’t make me want to puke up my dinner.

Male rape victims being provided services

male victims of abuse being provided services

both of the above being recognized by society

judicial fairness

laws which do not entitle nor discriminate between sexes

i could go on, but i expect at least five kittens for now.

Tags: misandry feminism mra
11 notes
reblogged via honeyonbeez
Permalink
nerdydyke:

ragecomics4you:

..Dafuq did I just read?
http://ragecomics4you.tumblr.com

Am I the only one who noticed how expensive that pony is? $200.50 being the “current bid” and 74 bids on it. I really have to wonder about that one.

Ahahahahahahahahaha
/dying

nerdydyke:

ragecomics4you:

..Dafuq did I just read?

http://ragecomics4you.tumblr.com

Am I the only one who noticed how expensive that pony is? $200.50 being the “current bid” and 74 bids on it. I really have to wonder about that one.

Ahahahahahahahahaha

/dying


44 notes
reblogged via nerdymouse
Permalink

veganltw:

So why can’t I wear it? 

  • Headdresses promote stereotyping of Native cultures.
  • The image of a warbonnet and warpaint wearing Indian is one that has been created and perpetuated by Hollywood  and only bears minimal resemblance to traditional regalia of Plains tribes. It furthers the stereotype that Native peoples are one monolithic culture, when in fact there are 500+ distinct tribes with their own cultures. It also places Native people in the historic past, as something that cannot exist in modern society. We don’t walk around in ceremonial attire everyday, but we still exist and are still Native.
  • Headdresses, feathers, and warbonnets have deep spiritual significance.
    The wearing of feathers and warbonnets in Native communities is not a fashion choice. Eagle feathers are presented as symbols of honor and respect and have to be earned. Some communities give them to children when they become adults through special ceremonies, others present the feathers as a way of commemorating an act or event of deep significance. Warbonnets especially are reserved for respected figures of power. The other issue is that warbonnets are reserved for men in Native communities, and nearly all of these pictures show women sporting the headdresses. I can’t read it as an act of feminism or subverting the patriarchal society, it’s an act of utter disrespect for the origins of the practice. (see my post on sweatlodges for more on the misinterpretation of the role of women). This is just as bad as running around in a pope hat and a bikini, or a Sikh turban cause it’s “cute”.  
  • It’s just like wearing blackface.
    “Playing Indian” has a long history in the United States, all the way back to those original tea partiers in Boston, and in no way is it better than minstral shows or dressing up in blackface. You are pretending to be a race that you are not, and are drawing upon stereotypes to do so. Like my first point said, you’re collapsing distinct cultures, and in doing so, you’re asserting your power over them. Which leads me to the next issue.
  • There is a history of genocide and colonialism involved that continues today.
    By the sheer fact that you live in the United States you are benefiting from the history of genocide and continued colonialism of Native peoples. That land you’re standing on? Indian land. Taken illegally so your ancestor who came to the US could buy it and live off it, gaining valuable capital (both monetary and cultural) that passed down through the generations to you. Have I benefited as well, given I was raised in a white, suburban community? yes. absolutely. but by dismissing and minimizing the continued subordination and oppression of Natives in the US by donning your headdress, you are contributing to the culture of power that continues the cycle today.

But I don’t mean it in that way, I just think it’s cute!

  • Well hopefully I’ve illuminated that there’s more at play here than just a “cute” fashion choice. Sorry for taking away your ignorance defense. 

But I consider it honoring to Native Americans!

  • I think that this cartoon is a proper answer, but I’ll add that having a drunken girl wearing a headdress and a bikini dancing at an outdoor concert does not honor me. I remember reading somewhere that it was also “honoring the fine craftsmanship of Native Americans”. Those costume shop chicken feather headdresses aren’t honoring Native craftsmanship. And you will be very hard pressed to find a Native artist who is closely tied to their community making headdresses for sale. See the point about their sacredness and significance.

I’m just wearing it because it’s “ironic”!

  • I’m all for irony. Finger mustaches, PBR, kanye glasses, old timey facial hair, 80’s spandex—fine, funny, a bit over-played, but ironic, I guess. Appropriating someone’s culture and cavorting around town in your skinny jeans with a feathered headdress, moccasins, and turquoise jewelry in an attempt to be ‘counterculture’? Not ironic. If you’re okay with being a walking representative of 500+ years of colonialism and racism, or don’t mind perpetuating the stereotypes that we as Native people have been fighting against for just as long, by all means, go for it. But by embracing the current tribal trends you aren’t asserting yourself as an individual, you are situating yourself in a culture of power that continues to oppress Native peoples in the US. And really, if everyone is doing it, doesn’t that take away from the irony? am I missing the point on the irony? maybe. how is this even ironic? I’m starting to confuse myself. but it’s still not a defense.

Stop getting so defensive, it’s seriously just fashion!

  • Did you read anything I just wrote? It’s not “just” fashion. There is a lot more at play here. This is a matter of power and who has the right to represent my culture. (I also enjoy asking myself questions that elicit snarky answers.) 

What about the bigger issues in Indian Country? Poverty, suicide rates, lack of resources, disease, etc? Aren’t those more important that hipster headdresses?

  • Yes, absolutely. But, I’ll paraphrase Jess Yee in this post, and say these are very real issues and challenges in our communities, but when the only images of Natives that Americans see are incorrect, and place Natives in the historic past, it erases our current presence, and makes it impossible for the current issues to exist in the collective American consciousness. Our cultures and lives are something that only exist in movies or in the past, not today. So it’s a cycle, and in order to break that cycle, we need to question and interrogate the stereotypes and images that erase our current presence—while we simultaneously tackle the pressing issues in Indian Country. They’re closely linked, and at least this is a place to start.   

Well then, Miss Cultural Appropriation Police, what CAN I wear?

  • If you choose to wear something Native, buy it from a Native. There are federal laws that protect Native artists and craftspeople who make genuine jewelry, art, etc. (see info here about The Indian Arts and Crafts Act). Anything you buy should have a label that says “Indian made” or “Native made”. Talk to the artist. find out where they’re from. Be diligent. Don’t go out in a full “costume”. It’s ok to have on some beaded earrings or a turquoise ring, but don’t march down the street wearing a feather, with loaded on jewelry, and a ribbon shirt. Ask yourself: if you ran into a Native person, would you feel embarrassed or feel the need to justify yourself? As commenter Bree pointed out, it’s ok to own a shirt with kimono sleeves, but you wouldn’t go out wearing full kabuki makeup to a bar. Just take a minute to question your sartorial choices before you go out.       

…and an editorial comment:  I should also note that I have absolutely nothing against hipsters. In fact, some would argue I have hipster-leaning tendencies. In my former San Francisco life, had been known to have a drink or two in the clouds of smoke outside at Zeitgeist, and enjoyed shopping on Haight street. I enjoy drinking PBR out of the can when I go to the dive bars near my apartment where I throw darts and talk about sticking it to ‘The Man’. I own several fringed hipster scarves, more than one pair of ironic fake ray-ban wayfarers, and two plaid button downs. I’m also not trying to stereotype and say that all hipsters do/wear the above, just like not every hipster thinks it’s cool to wear a headdress. So, I don’t hate hipsters, I hate ignorance and cultural appropriation. There is a difference. Just thought I should clear that up.

I actually received a feather once after native school (it was a summer school of sorts for native kids to learn more about their culture) and it was a huge event. Very cool stuff.

I had it for years. Kept it in a photo album.

Even though I was a kid and I wasn’t a war hero or anything, it made me feel really proud to have that one little feather.

(Source: veganparty)


17,746 notes
reblogged via nerdymouse
~ Wednesday, May 30 ~
Permalink

When Positive SJ Alleys Go Bad

So the big thing you see all over the place is this anti-“slut shaming” propaganda. While I agree that a person should be able to do whatever they want with their own body, I also feel that you can seriously take this stuff too far.

Recently there was a girl who’d been asking for some help. She’d been sleeping with whoever would so much as look at her, basically. She began this behavior shortly after breaking up with her first boyfriend, and she just agrees to sex because she feels like she has nothing to lose.

She wanted help. So a friend and myself chatted with her over it and tried to help her out (primarily with her remarkably low self-esteem). Meanwhile the thread is getting reamed by a bunch of people flailing all over the place about how she should feel great over it. How it’s totally not a problem, she should have sex with as many people as she wants, etc. 

But she doesn’t. She DOES value sex as more than just some physical act, and she has a RIGHT to that. She has a right to be upset, she has a right to sit down and figure out why she’s doing this and see if she can get some assistance. 

While in the end I think things turned out well, I was completely appalled by the anti-slut shaming crap that was filling the thread.

You can be proud to be a slut. But you do not have to be a slut, and you do not have to be proud to be one, either. Acceptance. It goes both ways.

Tags: slut shaming feminism
3 notes
Permalink
goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

daleksdontcry:

goldenheartedrose:

Yup, if you see anything wrong with the above photo, feel free to unfollow me. 

I see a couple of things wrong……
These ladies are not wearing hats! and so technically not in uniform. Also, I’m sure they didn’t obtain permission from their CO and the PR dept of their duty post before posting these pictures of themselves in uniform to a public forum.
So, yes, there is some disrespect to the uniform and the UCMJ, but the babies have nothing to do with it. 

You’re right about the covers (hats).  They’re outside, so they should be in full uniform. 
However, they DID obtain permission from the media relations department of the AF (though to be fair, that isn’t mentioned in the linked article; it is mentioned in other reports of the “controversy”). 

I SEE SOMETHING WRONG!
Animal prints are so tacky.

I think that’s a nursing wrap type thing, and oh my God, they do not make those in good colors at ALL.  I never used one with my kids (tended to just use the tshirt over a tank top trick instead), but they come in the worst colors and patterns.  Well, not my taste anyhow. 

I actually do have a problem with this. The point of women being in the military is not about “OH MY GOD LOOK THEY’RE WOMEN YAY GO THEM”. It’s about simply being human. They are not special snowflakes for being female soldiers, and they are not special snowflakes for their ability to breastfeed. This entire thing is nonsense. You don’t see male soldiers going around flashing their dongs proudly. The point is that sex/gender should not matter, and posts of this nature only enable the fact that it does. Please do NOT support this kind of stuff.

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

daleksdontcry:

goldenheartedrose:

Yup, if you see anything wrong with the above photo, feel free to unfollow me. 

I see a couple of things wrong……

These ladies are not wearing hats! and so technically not in uniform. Also, I’m sure they didn’t obtain permission from their CO and the PR dept of their duty post before posting these pictures of themselves in uniform to a public forum.

So, yes, there is some disrespect to the uniform and the UCMJ, but the babies have nothing to do with it. 

You’re right about the covers (hats).  They’re outside, so they should be in full uniform. 

However, they DID obtain permission from the media relations department of the AF (though to be fair, that isn’t mentioned in the linked article; it is mentioned in other reports of the “controversy”). 

I SEE SOMETHING WRONG!

Animal prints are so tacky.

I think that’s a nursing wrap type thing, and oh my God, they do not make those in good colors at ALL.  I never used one with my kids (tended to just use the tshirt over a tank top trick instead), but they come in the worst colors and patterns.  Well, not my taste anyhow. 

I actually do have a problem with this. The point of women being in the military is not about “OH MY GOD LOOK THEY’RE WOMEN YAY GO THEM”. It’s about simply being human. They are not special snowflakes for being female soldiers, and they are not special snowflakes for their ability to breastfeed. This entire thing is nonsense. You don’t see male soldiers going around flashing their dongs proudly. The point is that sex/gender should not matter, and posts of this nature only enable the fact that it does. Please do NOT support this kind of stuff.

(Source: today)


2,356 notes
reblogged via nerdymouse
Permalink
pussy-envy:

responsible reappropriation folks! Don’t claim terms you have no right to and don’t ever forget their histories and how they effect others! (sorry the handwriting is so messy. got kinda worked up while writing)
xox pearly

Why are people supporting this? I don’t see the logic.

pussy-envy:

responsible reappropriation folks! Don’t claim terms you have no right to and don’t ever forget their histories and how they effect others! (sorry the handwriting is so messy. got kinda worked up while writing)

xox pearly

Why are people supporting this? I don’t see the logic.


280 notes
reblogged via nerdymouse
Permalink

I do not like seeing pictures of mangled corpses on my dash.

Brings me back to military days.

Most unpleasant. Please drop a warning or link that stuff, guys.

holy crap man.


~ Tuesday, May 29 ~
Permalink

derpjerk:

worldsweburntogether:

I can’t figure out how to reblog this thing so that I can correct the person. Not trying to pass it off, but is anyone able to figure it out? The theme is sort of blinding me.

http://save-the-world-one-day-at-a-time.tumblr.com/post/24042837570

U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1999) are inaccurate, due to the definition of rape used in that study.

Rapes not reported to law enforcement is an impossible figure to prove, and probably reflects more males than females anyway.

The rest don’t have anything to do with your post.

If the theme of the blog bothers you, just copy paste into notepad.  Good luck!

Thanks, and yeah, I agree. I was planning to say as much, but I think I’ll just pass what you wrote along, if you don’t mind. My issue was that I can’t seem to find the ‘reblog’ button.


3 notes
reblogged via 1spoopyjerk